Some movies are just not to be touched, revamped
and continued, since they represent cult features that changed cinematography,
redefined entire genres and influenced the entire pop culture.
One of those revolutionary stories and unbeaten representations
of the future is the Phillip K. Dick’s and Ridley Scott’s masterpiece SF-noir about the robots and artificial intelligence as the
ultimate frontier of mankind, ''Blade Runner''.
Unlike the many similar contemporary cash driven
desires to continue the story and finally give some of the much needed answers
to the 80s classics, the production team for „Blade Runner: 2049” lead by the
creator of the original, Ridley Scott, did their homework and did it well.
They chose one of the best directors in Hollywood
right now, Dennis Villeneuve and casted one of the more stellar crews in recent history of SF making
(Gosling,
Wright,
Leto and of course, Harrison Ford).
The visual result was just stunning, since gifted
director meticulously solved every single detail in each scene. Transferring
the legendary atmosphere of the first part of the (unfortunately) saga was just
done with flying colors and that deserves every appraisal.
However, this is where the good things top and
give way to the cancer that’s eating 21st century Hollywood.
Lame scripts.
Just to be clear, the original „Blade Runner” was
probably the weakest script of all the Top 10 movies of all times it rightfully
belongs to, but was also the revolutionary insight into the future, offering
some of the most intriguing and so exploited concepts that followed it.
„Blade Runner: 2049” doesn’t have any of those
things, since it offers neither new concepts, neither viable characters, nor
acting or even some decent answers. It just wanders off, not showing any signs
of life and driving the stellar crew into the average, while making the script
look blunt and unfinished.
„Blade Runner: 2049” is a beautiful replicant of
the original movie, with some great camera, color, production and light, but
also with a mediocre script unworthy of the name it continues.
FOTO: cdn.vox-cdn.com
No comments:
Post a Comment